create money

search for more blogs here

 

"He released a wild bobcat in a busy bar - just 'because' he wanted to?" posted by ~Ray
Posted on 2009-01-08 20:50:27

is an compose a speaker a master marketer and copywriter for some of the most successful populate in the world. Troy was the protégé program director for Ted Nicholas who has sold over $4 BILLION dollars in products and services with the techniques that Troy has mastered. Responsive enjoin Marketing. Inc. Direct marketing implementation and outsourcingPhone: 403.259.4566Fax: 403.259.2092 The story says at one time he so loved 'stirring it up' that he letloose a mad hungry bobcat in a bar FULL of drunk people - just to seehow fast populate would move. Wild account Peyto is from my neck of the woods. He used to live and worknot far from my office. If he was comfort alive he would be proud ofwhat I am about to do... Over the past 6 years I have invested a substantial amount in myeducation. I undergo learned from the beat in the marketing world - andhave been fortunate to work with many of them one-on-one. Through that education. I undergo been able to create millions of dollarsin revenues for my clients. We undergo launched products and serviceswith tens of thousands of populate buying them immediately upon launch. We have created systems that act to create revenues years later untouched from the initial development. We undergo shared these techniques I have mastered and developed with thousands of populate across the planet. ******************************************* But there is still a problem I see out there... ******************************************* The problem for most populate is access to these people - and then the determine tag associated with being trained by them. Many people won't invest the time and money that I do in their business growth and continuing education. Many entrepreneurs are at a loss as to how they can get enjoin access from those who create empires for a living. **********************************************Meet Ed McNally - The Beer Baron who took over the world dominated by the big boys. ********************************************** Ed went from representing a assort of Alberta barley growers in a lawsuit to being the owner of a publicly traded $38,000,000 brewingcompany... . an annual event where anyone can put together a commercial to help them sell their micro-beers.********************************************** > populate plan for a year in advance.> People get dressed up to play the part.> And populate carry to the table some incredible commercials that Big move back and forth Beer continues to run year after year. If you be to learn how to take your startup or existing business toan international level get populate clamoring over themselves on how todo your marketing work for you for remove and create a world-wide brandthat brings in tens of millions of dollars every year... I undergo put together an exceptional all-new line-up of millionaireentrepreneurs coaches and small business growth specialists. **********************************************"WOW! The most valuable business information ever presented in one room I undergo ever had the allow to be a part of. undergo has been priceless. Thank you so much for everything you have done to bring this all together." PS: We have speakers coming in from all over the globe and arecovering strategies and techniques you ordain not sight elsewhere ideasthan can help you double your business. PPS: I mentioned that Ed McNally hosts the Eddie Awards.. well I amhosting the Wild West Marketing Awards this year. Sign up for theevent submit to us your beat marketing strategies that have worked foryou in your business. We will choose the top 5 or 6 success stories -and you ordain then show your success to those in attendance... The winner ordain receive priceless publicity thousands of dollars inprizes and an incredible opportunity to claim the 2008 Trophy. Details on this are available when you sign up. measure if you are a film hit - and are interested in creating someadvertising and videos for the Wild West Marketing and Wealth arrive at -please let me experience. I have a great furnish for you.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://advertising.ducttapemarketing.com/2008/02/he-released-a-w.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam


"How To Build 22938 Links To Your Blog" posted by ~Ray
Posted on 2008-09-15 21:12:26

It’s no secret that building links to your website will help drive more referral traffic as well as increase your rankings in explore and the other major search engines. In previous ProBlogger posts and have talked about it. Darren has also been known to create a post on the topic. Before getting started on the tips it’s important to know how to check the number of links Google recognizes. Most populate know about the link:www. YourDomainName com command that you can write into explore. This function however will only return a sample number of links to your site and does not show the end picture. To find out how many links Google actually sees you need to create an account at. It’s free to sign up and the information you ordain receive is of vital importance if you are trying to improve your explore rankings. If you already have an account simply go to the Dashboard click on your domain name click on Links on the left side bar and then select the pages with external links option to see how many websites are really linking to you. about the importance of having quality content if you want to stand out as a successful blogger. Quite simply if you aren’t writing material that is new different and offers an interesting perspective you won’t get readers or links to your blog. Just as important. I believe when you’re getting started is to pick a niche and dominate it. If you’re not making money online yet don’t write a blog about how to make money online! There is too much competition and you don’t have valuable content to add. sight a topic that you are passionate about and that isn’t too competitive yet. As an example. I chose famous entrepreneur stories. I now have the largest collection of stories of famous entrepreneurs anywhere online and get linked to as a resource. I’ve since been able to expand beyond the famous entrepreneur stories but it’s important to first start with a niche and get known as an expert in your handle. Once you have picked your niche get involved in the community surrounding it. No matter what topic you pick there are blogs and forums already discussing it. Join the conversation! When I first started my site I listed the top 10 blogs and forums where entrepreneurs hung out. I commented on the blogs helped people in the forums and answered questions as they came up. The bloggers appreciated my valuable insights and the forum members loved the help I gave them. I always included my website in my signature and pretty soon I was generating merchandise and links from the community sites. Because I was getting known as an expert I also had people link to me from their sites without me having to affix a comment or forum entry on theirs! People link to Darren because he’s the best in the world at helping bloggers move their blogs into businesses. What are you going to be the best at? Another strategy I used to create awareness and build links was to get media attention. I put keywords relating to my niche into a (a free tool that lets you know when a new story comes out around a particular keyword) found news stories that dealt with the entrepreneurs I was profiling and contacted the reporters to praise them on a great article. I also offered them my insights and added them to a media list that I created in Excel. From then on I would send them a touch release every two weeks that dealt with a new famous entrepreneur story on my website. I also submitted the stories to free online PR directories and did some research as to how to create verbally an effective press release and experimented with different headlines. This led to articles being written about my website in the New York Times. Globe and Mail (Canada’s most respected daily newspaper) the Dallas Morning News and countless other publications. It also led to television and communicate appearances. Each time I gave them great stories as well as promoted my website. Always remember to ask for a link back from the media outlet. They are usually very highly ranked and the link can help control your search engine rankings. Social networking is all the rage now but it’s more than just air. An effective social networking race can help drive tremendous amounts of traffic as well as create links to your site. I haven’t personally gotten much from sites like Facebook and MySpace but the news and bookmarking sites like StumbleUpon. Digg and del icio us have been fantastic merchandise and link generators for my website. The key I’ve found is to start off with quality content and then get the community to help you promote it. For example at the end of last year I compiled a list of the Top 50 SEO Posts of 2007 (Darren’s made the list). It was a list that brought genuine value to people and saved readers a lot of time. Instead of having to dig into each communicate themselves we did the work for them to find the beat posts on SEO of the year. Once we finished the top 50 we let everyone on the enumerate know about it. Many of them blogged about it and linked back to us others submitted it to StumbleUpon and other social networking sites. In the first week of the list being out StumbleUpon alone sent me over 5,000 visitors to that one page! When I first started the place I submitted it to all the relevant directories that I could find. In all honesty I didn’t get many hits from them except from but I viewed it as a link building exercise that would eventually pay off. If you run any kind of events you need to also put them on Craigslist. We run a number of offline events for entrepreneurs and Craigslist helped send us a decent amount of traffic. Their pages also rank well and you can include a link back to your site from the postings you create. Wikipedia is another excellent source worth checking out. Like every other webmaster before Wikipedia put nofollows on their links I was trying to get all my pages listed as external links on the famous entrepreneur related pages. The prove? The editors quickly removed my links and wrote an email to me warning me to stop. I did forbid posting but was surprised to find out that I kept getting traffic from Wikipedia. It turns out that a number of my readers had used my articles as references for different famous entrepreneurs. As a result they included a cerebrate and it was driving traffic! It again all comes down to being the best at something and dominating your niche. If I didn’t have good content then I would not have received the links from Wikipedia. As wonderful as it is to get bloggers and other website owners to link to you on the merit of your content alone sometimes they need a push and an incentive to do so. As a result of building a popular website I began recruiting other experts to write for my site. Once you build up credibility in your niche you will have people who want to be associated with you. As an example. I wonder how many populate are trying to guest communicate for Darren while he’s gone? For my own place if the articles my guest authors submitted were relevant and valuable. I put them up. I then wrote to my authors and told them that if they linked back to my site from theirs I would give them even more exposure on my site and list them as Premium Partners. The incentive worked for many of them and I quickly built even more backlinks to my site from reputable experts. It sometimes takes thinking outside the box but if you can find a way to help another webmaster in return for them linking to you the extra incentive can make the difference between getting and not getting that all important link. Get as high a summon Rank link as you can from the websites who profile you. A link on a Page Rank 1 internal page versus a Page Rank 5 homepage ordain make a big difference to your site. Just because two pages are on the same domain name it doesn’t mean that they carry the same link value. When getting a link don’t tell people what anchor text to use (the blue text that is underlined). If all your links undergo the same anchor text you can get banned from explore for that keyword. I always ask my link partners to use anchor text that they conclude best describes what my website is all about. Evan this is a great post. It’s amazing that regardless how many days and years you construe and learn about SEO you end up finding out that there is somebody out there that you can learn from. I won’t point out what I learned from this post but my point is that we all need to keep learning and reading and improving. Thanks for the great work. Regarding the comment about submitting your site to Google and submitting the sites that link to you. I seem to find that Google does find me very quick. Usually by the next day so I don’t unusually focus my efforts here. Something has to go because there is only so much time in the day! Thanks for such a quality post - this article falls in line with one of Leo’s tips at ZenHabits which is to make your posts _insanely_ useful. Its probably my number one goal right now and this entry is a really good example. And thanks for the reminder on 1 hour a day for 24 hours rather than burning out. Its good to hear that - I tend to lean toward the second option and it doesn’t work. Thanks Evan for the great tips! My new blog is just starting out and while I’m still working on creating that quality circumscribe and refining my style and come to new posts. I am also building links here and there. I’m certainly no ProBlogger but in two months I have generated about $5 from ads ($70 more and hosting is covered!!!) and that trend is optimistically upwards. :) I too have found MySpace to be pretty dead for returns on my time there while StumbleUpon simply rocks! So that is where my cerebrate is right now understanding StumbleUpon and the dynamics of that system. My current links to my site are < 500 so what would you say about that for a site that started last December 2007? Is that good so far? About how many new links per month do you suspect is average for a ‘ProBlogger’? Is there a way to compare my stats with others (without some sneaky time-consuming methods). I read your comments about Wikipedia with a rueful chuckle as the exact same thing happened to me. I’d interview people and write articles about subjects who had entries on Wikipedia so I’d displace links there - only to undergo them removed by Wikipedia. Very annoying. Thanks also for the info on signing up to Google’s Webmaster tools. I had tried the link thing and wasn’t happy about what it showed… I’ll try it the other way and see what it tells me. Wayne - 500 links is a good start - keep up the work! Try to focus in on quality sites now that you have your base established. I just spent 6 months lining up a single link from a very respected website. After you get your base going cerebrate on the quality over the quantity. Every blogger starts somewhere so don’t get discouraged about the $5 - remember that the content will continue to bring home the bacon for you years down the road so you’re building a valuable asset!! I have to agree that building these links are a slow process! I’ve only just started out blogging and movement has been slow but I do experience I’ve just gotta stick with it. And this affix has been particularly encouraging. Thanks. Evan! It doesnt take long to build links if you do it right i have grown to 9,000 links in just under a few weeks. Its possible if you know how be up link building on google has lots of stuff. Page Rank is important because not all links are created equal. For example a link from ProBlogger’s home page is worth a lot more than a link from the inside page on a brand new blog with no Page be. Page Rank can also express you if a blog has been banned by Google if it has been (see JohnChow com) then a cerebrate from that site won’t back up you and can actually have a negative effect on your own site. Hi Barbara Peterson - the trick with Wikipedia is that the cerebrate has to be of genuine value. If it’s obviously just a related link then you’ll get removed. If it’s adding serious value to the post then it’s more likely to stay on - but even then you can undergo an overbearing administrator who removes you. I’ve also found more luck with less popular pages than the ones that are constantly being update. Chances are you can add more determine to a summon that hasn’t had as much work and the link will be. explore Says:“Please note: Only the top-level page from a host is necessary; you do not need to submit each individual page. Our crawler. Googlebot ordain be able to find the rest. Google updates its index on a regular basis so updated or outdated link submissions are not necessary. Dead links will ‘fade out’ of our index on our next crawl when we modify our entire list.” You should of course submit your homepage. Sometimes however if your linking structure isn’t well done then Google can’t reach down into your lower pages. Google also sometimes misses pages you undergo on your site. My webpage for example has over 46,000 pages of content so it’s understandable that Google might miss a few of them. Google also encourages you to let them know about what’s on your place through their sitemap tool - you can learn more about it at Thanks for response Evan. My only anticipate is maybe I undergo too high KW density on my domiciliate summon for my main KW I think around 13%. Example each nav-button features KW… maybe I should tone this down… I do undergo close to 500 incoming links. My categories for cerebrate exchange are come up defined and closely related to my niche place and I refuse quite a few unrelated requests. However I guess I may be linking through to some poor quality sites? Or even a linkfarm or two? not sure unless I analyse all of my link exchanges - is this advisable? If so. Ugh… I’ve heard that it’s best not to link to low PR sites - but how are they ever going to move up the ranks without a little bring up from higher ranking sites? Thanks for the update.. I am a web-developer and I know how to optimize each page for google. Maybe for layman this option is right but I do suggest If anyone owns a website he/she has to work a lot on sitemaps meta-tags and SEO this way no page will be left alone.. I have been so busy with my office and freelance work and I finally uploaded my website on Jan 2008 and I undergo each page listed on Google and sometimes it takes only 1-2 hours for google to list my page. I undergo personally observed that. Hi Russell - It’s good to have a mix of links out to pages with high Page Rank as well as low. I would worry if all the links are going to low Page be sites. I would mind even more if you are linking out to a link farm or page that has been banned by Google. If you had thousands of links then I wouldn’t worry about it too much but if it’s still a relatively small amount then you don’t want to risk a penalization by explore. For the keyword density. 13% sounds very high to me. What I usually do is use my keywords once every carve up or two paragraphs of text and make sure to use them in the title tags url and H1 tag. Hi Missy - No this is not correct. If you have lost Page Rank you can still submit a sitemap to Google. My own Page Rank has fluctuated in the past and when I had a drop I could still refer my sitemaps. If you have been banned however a sitemap won’t do you any good because you’re not in Google’s list. The best solution here is to fix the spammy elements of your site and submit a re-inclusion request in Google’s webmaster tools to get yourself listed again. PageRank has absolutely NOTHING to do with your SERP rankings. Or anything for that matter. They are two completely displace algos. It doesn’t be if you get links from PR1 or PR5 sites. What google cares about is relevancy and PR has nothing at all to do with relevance. Most of the time a site with a high PR is more trusted than a site with low PR which COULD mean that the link has a higher value. But it’s not thanks to the PR. Stop caring about it. The only good thing about getting a high PR is so you could change the site to people who think it actually mean something. Google’s entire system is based on links. If you don’t have links to your site then you won’t rank for any keywords unless they are extremely uncompetitive. With all the link farms that were soon created after Google became the #1 search engine it makes sense that the quantity of links is not a good measure on its own to back up rank a site. You could undergo 1,000,000 links to your site but if they are all low quality it won’t do you much good. One link from a well respected summon does a lot more than thousands of poor quality links. A great example was Wikipedia. Before they turned their links to “nofollow” I had a number of my pages linked from them. All of those pages quickly ranked to the first page of search results in Google. Google likes high authority websites and if you get linked from them your chances of ranking higher also goes up. PageRank is the measurement of how much authority Google thinks a website has. There is a reason why ProBlogger has a Page Rank of 6 while new blogs go away out with 0. Of course you still be the quality and related circumscribe. Just because you have a high Page Rank it doesn’t mean you’ll rank for a keyword outside of your area of interest. The two work hand in hand. Darren is not going to be for a keyword like “healthy foods” because his content doesn’t communicate to that topic. However if you write in “alter money blogging”. Darren is #1. If two pages undergo similar circumscribe and are targeted the same keywords the page with the higher Page be will come out on top in the explore index. Evan what value is the Wikipedia? I heard they are no follow links and same for Craigs list. What value does Google give to no go links? Also one of my blogs went from PR 5 to the gray bar. Any chance to resurrect that? In the last modify in January 2008 one of my internal pages went from PR 4 to the color bar and this week’s February update it went back to normal. undergo you heard about this problem concerning blogs getting the color bar on the domiciliate page? The Wikipedia strategy is more for traffic than building Page Rank. After search engines and social networks wikipedia is my #1 referring site. There are some who believe that a cerebrate from Wikipedia does still back up your SERPs even though it’s no go because explore loves Wikipedia so much. A number of the pages that I am linked from in Wikipedia have risen in Google’s SERPs but I don’t undergo any comprehensive data to say that it helps. If you dropped from a 5 then you likely have been hit with a explore penalty. undergo you done anything that you would get penalized? The best thing to do is fix the problems and then submit a re-inclusion request through your Google webmasters account.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.problogger.net/archives/2008/02/28/how-to-build-22938-links-to-your-blog/

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam


"How To Build 22938 Links To Your Blog" posted by ~Ray
Posted on 2008-09-15 21:12:06

It’s no secret that building links to your website will help drive more referral traffic as well as increase your rankings in Google and the other major search engines. In previous ProBlogger posts and have talked about it. Darren has also been known to create a post on the topic. Before getting started on the tips it’s important to know how to check the number of links Google recognizes. Most people know about the link:www. YourDomainName com command that you can type into Google. This function however will only return a sample number of links to your place and does not show the end picture. To find out how many links explore actually sees you need to create an account at. It’s free to sign up and the information you will receive is of vital importance if you are trying to improve your explore rankings. If you already have an be simply go to the Dashboard click on your domain name move on Links on the left align bar and then select the pages with external links option to see how many websites are really linking to you. about the importance of having quality circumscribe if you want to stand out as a successful blogger. Quite simply if you aren’t writing material that is new different and offers an interesting perspective you won’t get readers or links to your blog. Just as important. I believe when you’re getting started is to choose a niche and dominate it. If you’re not making money online yet don’t write a blog about how to make money online! There is too much competition and you don’t have valuable content to add. sight a topic that you are passionate about and that isn’t too competitive yet. As an example. I chose famous entrepreneur stories. I now have the largest collection of stories of famous entrepreneurs anywhere online and get linked to as a resource. I’ve since been able to expand beyond the famous entrepreneur stories but it’s important to first start with a niche and get known as an expert in your field. Once you have picked your niche get involved in the community surrounding it. No matter what topic you pick there are blogs and forums already discussing it. connect the conversation! When I first started my site I listed the top 10 blogs and forums where entrepreneurs hung out. I commented on the blogs helped people in the forums and answered questions as they came up. The bloggers appreciated my valuable insights and the forum members loved the help I gave them. I always included my website in my signature and pretty soon I was generating merchandise and links from the community sites. Because I was getting known as an expert I also had people link to me from their sites without me having to post a comment or forum entry on theirs! People link to Darren because he’s the best in the world at helping bloggers move their blogs into businesses. What are you going to be the best at? Another strategy I used to create awareness and build links was to get media attention. I put keywords relating to my niche into a (a free drive that lets you know when a new story comes out around a particular keyword) found news stories that dealt with the entrepreneurs I was profiling and contacted the reporters to congratulate them on a great article. I also offered them my insights and added them to a media list that I created in Excel. From then on I would send them a press channel every two weeks that dealt with a new famous entrepreneur story on my website. I also submitted the stories to free online PR directories and did some research as to how to write an effective touch release and experimented with different headlines. This led to articles being written about my website in the New York Times. Globe and Mail (Canada’s most respected daily newspaper) the Dallas Morning News and countless other publications. It also led to television and radio appearances. Each time I gave them great stories as well as promoted my website. Always remember to ask for a link back from the media outlet. They are usually very highly ranked and the link can help drive your search engine rankings. Social networking is all the act now but it’s more than just hype. An effective social networking campaign can back up control tremendous amounts of traffic as well as build links to your site. I haven’t personally gotten much from sites like Facebook and MySpace but the news and bookmarking sites like StumbleUpon. Digg and del icio us have been fantastic traffic and cerebrate generators for my website. The key I’ve found is to start off with quality content and then get the community to back up you promote it. For example at the end of last year I compiled a list of the Top 50 SEO Posts of 2007 (Darren’s made the list). It was a list that brought genuine value to people and saved readers a lot of time. Instead of having to dig into each communicate themselves we did the work for them to sight the best posts on SEO of the year. Once we finished the top 50 we let everyone on the list know about it. Many of them blogged about it and linked back to us others submitted it to StumbleUpon and other social networking sites. In the first week of the list being out StumbleUpon alone sent me over 5,000 visitors to that one page! When I first started the site I submitted it to all the relevant directories that I could find. In all honesty I didn’t get many hits from them except from but I viewed it as a link building exercise that would eventually pay off. If you run any kind of events you need to also put them on Craigslist. We run a number of offline events for entrepreneurs and Craigslist helped displace us a decent amount of traffic. Their pages also rank come up and you can consider a link back to your site from the postings you create. Wikipedia is another excellent obtain worth checking out. desire every other webmaster before Wikipedia put nofollows on their links I was trying to get all my pages listed as external links on the famous entrepreneur related pages. The result? The editors quickly removed my links and wrote an email to me warning me to forbid. I did stop posting but was surprised to sight out that I kept getting traffic from Wikipedia. It turns out that a number of my readers had used my articles as references for different famous entrepreneurs. As a result they included a link and it was driving traffic! It again all comes down to being the best at something and dominating your niche. If I didn’t undergo good content then I would not have received the links from Wikipedia. As wonderful as it is to get bloggers and other website owners to link to you on the merit of your content alone sometimes they be a push and an incentive to do so. As a result of building a popular website I began recruiting other experts to create verbally for my site. Once you build up credibility in your niche you will have people who want to be associated with you. As an example. I wonder how many people are trying to guest blog for Darren while he’s gone? For my own site if the articles my guest authors submitted were relevant and valuable. I put them up. I then wrote to my authors and told them that if they linked back to my site from theirs I would give them even more exposure on my site and list them as Premium Partners. The incentive worked for many of them and I quickly built even more backlinks to my site from reputable experts. It sometimes takes thinking outside the box but if you can find a way to help another webmaster in go for them linking to you the extra incentive can make the difference between getting and not getting that all important link. Get as high a Page Rank cerebrate as you can from the websites who profile you. A link on a Page Rank 1 internal summon versus a Page Rank 5 homepage will make a big difference to your site. Just because two pages are on the same domain name it doesn’t mean that they carry the same link determine. When getting a cerebrate don’t tell populate what anchor text to use (the blue text that is underlined). If all your links undergo the same anchor text you can get banned from explore for that keyword. I always ask my cerebrate partners to use fasten text that they conclude best describes what my website is all about. Evan this is a great post. It’s amazing that regardless how many days and years you read and learn about SEO you end up finding out that there is somebody out there that you can learn from. I won’t inform out what I learned from this post but my point is that we all need to keep learning and reading and improving. Thanks for the great work. Regarding the comment about submitting your site to Google and submitting the sites that link to you. I seem to find that Google does find me very quick. Usually by the next day so I don’t unusually cerebrate my efforts here. Something has to go because there is only so much time in the day! Thanks for such a quality post - this article falls in line with one of Leo’s tips at ZenHabits which is to alter your posts _insanely_ useful. Its probably my number one goal right now and this entry is a really good example. And thanks for the reminder on 1 hour a day for 24 hours rather than burning out. Its good to hear that - I tend to lean toward the second option and it doesn’t work. Thanks Evan for the great tips! My new communicate is just starting out and while I’m still working on creating that quality content and refining my call and approach to new posts. I am also building links here and there. I’m certainly no ProBlogger but in two months I have generated about $5 from ads ($70 more and hosting is covered!!!) and that trend is optimistically upwards. :) I too have open MySpace to be pretty dead for returns on my time there while StumbleUpon simply rocks! So that is where my focus is right now understanding StumbleUpon and the dynamics of that system. My current links to my place are < 500 so what would you say about that for a site that started last December 2007? Is that good so far? About how many new links per month do you suspect is average for a ‘ProBlogger’? Is there a way to compare my stats with others (without some sneaky time-consuming methods). I construe your comments about Wikipedia with a rueful chuckle as the exact same thing happened to me. I’d interview people and write articles about subjects who had entries on Wikipedia so I’d place links there - only to have them removed by Wikipedia. Very annoying. Thanks also for the info on signing up to explore’s Webmaster tools. I had tried the link thing and wasn’t happy about what it showed… I’ll try it the other way and see what it tells me. Wayne - 500 links is a good go away - act up the bring home the bacon! Try to cerebrate in on quality sites now that you have your locate established. I just spent 6 months lining up a single cerebrate from a very respected website. After you get your base going focus on the quality over the quantity. Every blogger starts somewhere so don’t get discouraged about the $5 - remember that the content will continue to work for you years down the road so you’re building a valuable asset!! I have to agree that building these links are a slow process! I’ve only just started out blogging and movement has been slow but I do know I’ve just gotta stick with it. And this post has been particularly encouraging. Thanks. Evan! It doesnt take long to build links if you do it right i have grown to 9,000 links in just under a few weeks. Its possible if you know how look up link building on google has lots of stuff. Page Rank is important because not all links are created equal. For example a link from ProBlogger’s domiciliate page is worth a lot more than a link from the inside page on a brand new blog with no Page Rank. Page be can also tell you if a blog has been banned by explore if it has been (see JohnChow com) then a cerebrate from that site won’t help you and can actually have a negative effect on your own site. Hi Barbara Peterson - the trick with Wikipedia is that the link has to be of genuine value. If it’s obviously just a related link then you’ll get removed. If it’s adding serious value to the post then it’s more likely to stay on - but even then you can undergo an overbearing administrator who removes you. I’ve also found more luck with less popular pages than the ones that are constantly being modify. Chances are you can add more value to a page that hasn’t had as much work and the link ordain stay. explore Says:“Please note: Only the top-level page from a host is necessary; you do not need to refer each individual page. Our crawler. Googlebot ordain be able to sight the rest. Google updates its list on a regular basis so updated or outdated link submissions are not necessary. Dead links will ‘weaken out’ of our index on our next go when we update our entire index.” You should of cover submit your homepage. Sometimes however if your linking structure isn’t well done then Google can’t reach down into your lower pages. Google also sometimes misses pages you have on your place. My webpage for example has over 46,000 pages of content so it’s understandable that Google might desire a few of them. Google also encourages you to let them know about what’s on your site through their sitemap tool - you can learn more about it at Thanks for response Evan. My only guess is maybe I have too high KW density on my home summon for my main KW I think around 13%. Example each nav-button features KW… maybe I should tone this down… I do have change state to 500 incoming links. My categories for link transfer are well defined and closely related to my niche site and I refuse quite a few unrelated requests. However I suspect I may be linking through to some poor quality sites? Or even a linkfarm or two? not sure unless I review all of my link exchanges - is this advisable? If so. Ugh… I’ve heard that it’s best not to cerebrate to low PR sites - but how are they ever going to move up the ranks without a little boost from higher ranking sites? Thanks for the update.. I am a web-developer and I know how to hone each page for google. Maybe for layman this option is alter but I do suggest If anyone owns a website he/she has to work a lot on sitemaps meta-tags and SEO this way no page will be left alone.. I undergo been so work with my office and freelance work and I finally uploaded my website on Jan 2008 and I have each page listed on Google and sometimes it takes only 1-2 hours for google to index my page. I undergo personally observed that. Hi Russell - It’s good to have a mix of links out to pages with high Page Rank as come up as low. I would worry if all the links are going to low Page Rank sites. I would worry even more if you are linking out to a link do work or page that has been banned by Google. If you had thousands of links then I wouldn’t worry about it too much but if it’s comfort a relatively small amount then you don’t want to assay a penalization by Google. For the keyword density. 13% sounds very high to me. What I usually do is use my keywords once every carve up or two paragraphs of text and make sure to use them in the title tags url and H1 tag. Hi Missy - No this is not correct. If you have lost Page Rank you can still submit a sitemap to Google. My own Page Rank has fluctuated in the past and when I had a drop I could still submit my sitemaps. If you have been banned however a sitemap won’t do you any good because you’re not in Google’s index. The best solution here is to fix the spammy elements of your site and refer a re-inclusion request in Google’s webmaster tools to get yourself listed again. PageRank has absolutely NOTHING to do with your SERP rankings. Or anything for that matter. They are two completely separate algos. It doesn’t matter if you get links from PR1 or PR5 sites. What google cares about is relevancy and PR has nothing at all to do with relevance. Most of the time a site with a high PR is more trusted than a site with low PR which COULD mean that the cerebrate has a higher value. But it’s not thanks to the PR. Stop caring about it. The only good thing about getting a high PR is so you could sell the site to people who think it actually mean something. Google’s entire system is based on links. If you don’t have links to your place then you won’t rank for any keywords unless they are extremely uncompetitive. With all the link farms that were soon created after Google became the #1 search engine it makes sense that the quantity of links is not a good measure on its own to help rank a site. You could undergo 1,000,000 links to your site but if they are all low quality it won’t do you much good. One link from a come up respected page does a lot more than thousands of poor quality links. A great example was Wikipedia. Before they turned their links to “nofollow” I had a number of my pages linked from them. All of those pages quickly ranked to the first summon of search results in Google. Google likes high authority websites and if you get linked from them your chances of ranking higher also goes up. PageRank is the measurement of how much authority explore thinks a website has. There is a reason why ProBlogger has a summon Rank of 6 while new blogs start out with 0. Of cover you still need the quality and related content. Just because you have a high Page Rank it doesn’t mean you’ll rank for a keyword outside of your area of interest. The two work transfer in hand. Darren is not going to rank for a keyword desire “healthy foods” because his content doesn’t speak to that topic. However if you type in “make money blogging”. Darren is #1. If two pages have similar content and are targeted the same keywords the summon with the higher Page Rank will come out on top in the Google index. Evan what value is the Wikipedia? I heard they are no follow links and same for Craigs list. What value does Google give to no follow links? Also one of my blogs went from PR 5 to the gray bar. Any chance to resurrect that? In the last update in January 2008 one of my internal pages went from PR 4 to the gray bar and this week’s February update it went approve to normal. Have you heard about this problem concerning blogs getting the gray bar on the domiciliate page? The Wikipedia strategy is more for traffic than building Page Rank. After search engines and social networks wikipedia is my #1 referring site. There are some who believe that a link from Wikipedia does still back up your SERPs even though it’s no follow because Google loves Wikipedia so much. A number of the pages that I am linked from in Wikipedia have risen in Google’s SERPs but I don’t undergo any comprehensive data to say that it helps. If you dropped from a 5 then you likely have been hit with a Google penalty. Have you done anything that you would get penalized? The best thing to do is fix the problems and then submit a re-inclusion request through your Google webmasters account.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.problogger.net/archives/2008/02/28/how-to-build-22938-links-to-your-blog/

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam


"How To Build 22938 Links To Your Blog" posted by ~Ray
Posted on 2008-09-15 21:11:41

It’s no secret that building links to your website will help drive more referral traffic as well as increase your rankings in Google and the other major search engines. In previous ProBlogger posts and have talked about it. Darren has also been known to create a post on the topic. Before getting started on the tips it’s important to experience how to check the number of links explore recognizes. Most people know about the link:www. YourDomainName com command that you can write into Google. This function however will only return a consume be of links to your site and does not show the complete picture. To find out how many links Google actually sees you need to create an account at. It’s remove to sign up and the information you will receive is of vital importance if you are trying to alter your Google rankings. If you already have an account simply go to the Dashboard click on your domain name click on Links on the left side bar and then select the pages with external links option to see how many websites are really linking to you. about the importance of having quality content if you want to stand out as a successful blogger. Quite simply if you aren’t writing material that is new different and offers an interesting perspective you won’t get readers or links to your blog. Just as important. I believe when you’re getting started is to pick a niche and dominate it. If you’re not making money online yet don’t create verbally a communicate about how to alter money online! There is too much competition and you don’t have valuable circumscribe to add. sight a topic that you are passionate about and that isn’t too competitive yet. As an example. I chose famous entrepreneur stories. I now have the largest collection of stories of famous entrepreneurs anywhere online and get linked to as a resource. I’ve since been able to expand beyond the famous entrepreneur stories but it’s important to first start with a niche and get known as an expert in your field. Once you undergo picked your niche get involved in the community surrounding it. No matter what topic you pick there are blogs and forums already discussing it. Join the conversation! When I first started my site I listed the top 10 blogs and forums where entrepreneurs hung out. I commented on the blogs helped populate in the forums and answered questions as they came up. The bloggers appreciated my valuable insights and the forum members loved the help I gave them. I always included my website in my signature and pretty soon I was generating merchandise and links from the community sites. Because I was getting known as an expert I also had populate cerebrate to me from their sites without me having to post a comment or forum entry on theirs! People cerebrate to Darren because he’s the best in the world at helping bloggers turn their blogs into businesses. What are you going to be the best at? Another strategy I used to create awareness and build links was to get media attention. I put keywords relating to my niche into a (a free tool that lets you experience when a new story comes out around a particular keyword) found news stories that dealt with the entrepreneurs I was profiling and contacted the reporters to praise them on a great bind. I also offered them my insights and added them to a media enumerate that I created in Excel. From then on I would displace them a touch release every two weeks that dealt with a new famous entrepreneur story on my website. I also submitted the stories to free online PR directories and did some research as to how to write an effective press release and experimented with different headlines. This led to articles being written about my website in the New York Times. Globe and send (Canada’s most respected daily newspaper) the Dallas Morning News and countless other publications. It also led to television and communicate appearances. Each time I gave them great stories as well as promoted my website. Always remember to ask for a cerebrate back from the media outlet. They are usually very highly ranked and the link can help drive your search engine rankings. Social networking is all the rage now but it’s more than just hype. An effective social networking campaign can help drive tremendous amounts of traffic as well as build links to your site. I haven’t personally gotten much from sites like Facebook and MySpace but the news and bookmarking sites like StumbleUpon. Digg and del icio us have been fantastic traffic and link generators for my website. The key I’ve open is to start off with quality content and then get the community to help you promote it. For example at the end of last year I compiled a enumerate of the Top 50 SEO Posts of 2007 (Darren’s made the list). It was a list that brought genuine determine to populate and saved readers a lot of time. Instead of having to dig into each blog themselves we did the work for them to find the best posts on SEO of the year. Once we finished the top 50 we let everyone on the enumerate know about it. Many of them blogged about it and linked back to us others submitted it to StumbleUpon and other social networking sites. In the first week of the list being out StumbleUpon alone sent me over 5,000 visitors to that one page! When I first started the site I submitted it to all the relevant directories that I could sight. In all honesty I didn’t get many hits from them object from but I viewed it as a link building apply that would eventually pay off. If you run any kind of events you need to also put them on Craigslist. We run a number of offline events for entrepreneurs and Craigslist helped send us a decent amount of traffic. Their pages also rank well and you can include a link back to your site from the postings you create. Wikipedia is another excellent source worth checking out. desire every other webmaster before Wikipedia put nofollows on their links I was trying to get all my pages listed as external links on the famous entrepreneur related pages. The prove? The editors quickly removed my links and wrote an email to me warning me to stop. I did stop posting but was surprised to find out that I kept getting traffic from Wikipedia. It turns out that a number of my readers had used my articles as references for different famous entrepreneurs. As a result they included a link and it was driving traffic! It again all comes down to being the best at something and dominating your niche. If I didn’t have good circumscribe then I would not have received the links from Wikipedia. As wonderful as it is to get bloggers and other website owners to link to you on the merit of your circumscribe alone sometimes they need a push and an incentive to do so. As a result of building a popular website I began recruiting other experts to write for my place. Once you build up credibility in your niche you ordain undergo people who want to be associated with you. As an example. I wonder how many people are trying to guest communicate for Darren while he’s gone? For my own site if the articles my guest authors submitted were relevant and valuable. I put them up. I then wrote to my authors and told them that if they linked approve to my site from theirs I would give them even more exposure on my site and list them as Premium Partners. The incentive worked for many of them and I quickly built even more backlinks to my place from reputable experts. It sometimes takes thinking outside the box but if you can find a way to help another webmaster in go for them linking to you the extra incentive can make the difference between getting and not getting that all important link. Get as high a Page Rank link as you can from the websites who profile you. A cerebrate on a Page Rank 1 internal page versus a Page Rank 5 homepage will make a big difference to your place. Just because two pages are on the same domain name it doesn’t mean that they carry the same cerebrate value. When getting a link don’t express people what anchor text to use (the blue text that is underlined). If all your links have the same anchor text you can get banned from Google for that keyword. I always ask my link partners to use anchor text that they feel beat describes what my website is all about. Evan this is a great post. It’s amazing that regardless how many days and years you construe and hit the books about SEO you end up finding out that there is somebody out there that you can hit the books from. I won’t point out what I learned from this post but my point is that we all need to keep learning and reading and improving. Thanks for the great work. Regarding the mention about submitting your site to Google and submitting the sites that link to you. I seem to sight that Google does find me very quick. Usually by the next day so I don’t unusually focus my efforts here. Something has to go because there is only so much time in the day! Thanks for such a quality affix - this article falls in line with one of Leo’s tips at ZenHabits which is to alter your posts _insanely_ useful. Its probably my number one goal right now and this entry is a really good example. And thanks for the reminder on 1 hour a day for 24 hours rather than burning out. Its good to hear that - I tend to lean toward the second option and it doesn’t work. Thanks Evan for the great tips! My new blog is just starting out and while I’m still working on creating that quality content and refining my style and approach to new posts. I am also building links here and there. I’m certainly no ProBlogger but in two months I undergo generated about $5 from ads ($70 more and hosting is covered!!!) and that trend is optimistically upwards. :) I too have found MySpace to be pretty dead for returns on my time there while StumbleUpon simply rocks! So that is where my focus is right now understanding StumbleUpon and the dynamics of that system. My current links to my site are < 500 so what would you say about that for a site that started last December 2007? Is that good so far? About how many new links per month do you suspect is average for a ‘ProBlogger’? Is there a way to compare my stats with others (without some sneaky time-consuming methods). I read your comments about Wikipedia with a rueful express joy as the claim same thing happened to me. I’d interview people and write articles about subjects who had entries on Wikipedia so I’d displace links there - only to have them removed by Wikipedia. Very annoying. Thanks also for the info on signing up to explore’s Webmaster tools. I had tried the cerebrate thing and wasn’t happy about what it showed… I’ll try it the other way and see what it tells me. Wayne - 500 links is a good go away - keep up the bring home the bacon! Try to focus in on quality sites now that you have your base established. I just spent 6 months lining up a single cerebrate from a very respected website. After you get your base going focus on the quality over the quantity. Every blogger starts somewhere so don’t get discouraged about the $5 - remember that the content will continue to work for you years drink the road so you’re building a valuable asset!! I undergo to accept that building these links are a decrease affect! I’ve only just started out blogging and movement has been slow but I do know I’ve just gotta stick with it. And this post has been particularly encouraging. Thanks. Evan! It doesnt take desire to create links if you do it right i have grown to 9,000 links in just under a few weeks. Its possible if you experience how look up link building on google has lots of cram. Page Rank is important because not all links are created equal. For example a link from ProBlogger’s home page is worth a lot more than a cerebrate from the inside page on a brand new blog with no summon be. Page be can also tell you if a blog has been banned by Google if it has been (see JohnChow com) then a cerebrate from that site won’t help you and can actually have a negative cause on your own site. Hi Barbara Peterson - the cozen with Wikipedia is that the link has to be of genuine value. If it’s obviously just a related cerebrate then you’ll get removed. If it’s adding serious determine to the post then it’s more likely to stay on - but even then you can have an overbearing administrator who removes you. I’ve also found more luck with less popular pages than the ones that are constantly being update. Chances are you can add more value to a page that hasn’t had as much work and the link will stay. explore Says:“Please note: Only the top-level page from a entertain is necessary; you do not need to submit each individual page. Our crawler. Googlebot will be able to find the rest. Google updates its list on a regular basis so updated or outdated link submissions are not necessary. Dead links will ‘fade out’ of our index on our next crawl when we update our entire index.” You should of course submit your homepage. Sometimes however if your linking structure isn’t come up done then Google can’t reach down into your lower pages. Google also sometimes misses pages you have on your site. My webpage for example has over 46,000 pages of content so it’s understandable that Google might desire a few of them. Google also encourages you to let them know about what’s on your site through their sitemap tool - you can learn more about it at Thanks for response Evan. My only guess is maybe I have too high KW density on my home summon for my main KW I evaluate around 13%. Example each nav-button features KW… maybe I should tone this down… I do have close to 500 incoming links. My categories for link exchange are come up defined and closely related to my niche site and I refuse quite a few unrelated requests. However I guess I may be linking through to some poor quality sites? Or even a linkfarm or two? not sure unless I review all of my link exchanges - is this advisable? If so. Ugh… I’ve heard that it’s best not to cerebrate to low PR sites - but how are they ever going to move up the ranks without a little boost from higher ranking sites? Thanks for the update.. I am a web-developer and I know how to optimize each page for google. Maybe for layman this option is alter but I do suggest If anyone owns a website he/she has to bring home the bacon a lot on sitemaps meta-tags and SEO this way no page will be left alone.. I have been so busy with my office and do work work and I finally uploaded my website on Jan 2008 and I have each page listed on Google and sometimes it takes only 1-2 hours for google to index my page. I have personally observed that. Hi Russell - It’s good to have a mix of links out to pages with high Page Rank as well as low. I would worry if all the links are going to low Page Rank sites. I would mind even more if you are linking out to a link farm or page that has been banned by Google. If you had thousands of links then I wouldn’t worry about it too much but if it’s still a relatively small amount then you don’t want to risk a penalization by Google. For the keyword density. 13% sounds very high to me. What I usually do is use my keywords once every carve up or two paragraphs of text and make sure to use them in the title tags url and H1 tag. Hi Missy - No this is not correct. If you have lost Page Rank you can still refer a sitemap to Google. My own Page Rank has fluctuated in the past and when I had a drop I could still submit my sitemaps. If you undergo been banned however a sitemap won’t do you any good because you’re not in Google’s index. The best solution here is to fix the spammy elements of your place and submit a re-inclusion communicate in Google’s webmaster tools to get yourself listed again. PageRank has absolutely NOTHING to do with your SERP rankings. Or anything for that matter. They are two completely separate algos. It doesn’t matter if you get links from PR1 or PR5 sites. What google cares about is relevancy and PR has nothing at all to do with relevance. Most of the time a site with a high PR is more trusted than a site with low PR which COULD mean that the cerebrate has a higher value. But it’s not thanks to the PR. forbid caring about it. The only good thing about getting a high PR is so you could sell the site to people who think it actually mean something. explore’s entire system is based on links. If you don’t undergo links to your site then you won’t rank for any keywords unless they are extremely uncompetitive. With all the link farms that were soon created after Google became the #1 search engine it makes sense that the quantity of links is not a good measure on its own to back up rank a site. You could have 1,000,000 links to your place but if they are all low quality it won’t do you much good. One link from a come up respected page does a lot more than thousands of poor quality links. A great example was Wikipedia. Before they turned their links to “nofollow” I had a number of my pages linked from them. All of those pages quickly ranked to the first page of search results in explore. Google likes high authority websites and if you get linked from them your chances of ranking higher also goes up. PageRank is the measurement of how much authority Google thinks a website has. There is a reason why ProBlogger has a Page Rank of 6 while new blogs start out with 0. Of course you still be the quality and related content. Just because you undergo a high summon Rank it doesn’t mean you’ll be for a keyword outside of your area of arouse. The two work hand in hand. Darren is not going to rank for a keyword like “healthy foods” because his content doesn’t speak to that topic. However if you type in “alter money blogging”. Darren is #1. If two pages have similar content and are targeted the same keywords the page with the higher Page Rank will come out on top in the Google list. Evan what value is the Wikipedia? I heard they are no follow links and same for Craigs list. What determine does Google give to no go links? Also one of my blogs went from PR 5 to the gray bar. Any chance to resurrect that? In the last update in January 2008 one of my internal pages went from PR 4 to the gray bar and this week’s February update it went approve to normal. Have you heard about this problem concerning blogs getting the gray bar on the home page? The Wikipedia strategy is more for traffic than building Page Rank. After search engines and social networks wikipedia is my #1 referring place. There are some who believe that a link from Wikipedia does still help your SERPs change surface though it’s no follow because Google loves Wikipedia so much. A be of the pages that I am linked from in Wikipedia have risen in Google’s SERPs but I don’t have any comprehensive data to say that it helps. If you dropped from a 5 then you likely have been hit with a explore penalty. Have you done anything that you would get penalized? The best thing to do is fix the problems and then refer a re-inclusion communicate through your explore webmasters account.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.problogger.net/archives/2008/02/28/how-to-build-22938-links-to-your-blog/

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam


"How To Build 22938 Links To Your Blog" posted by ~Ray
Posted on 2008-09-15 21:11:41

It’s no secret that building links to your website will help drive more referral traffic as well as increase your rankings in explore and the other major search engines. In previous ProBlogger posts and have talked about it. Darren has also been known to create a post on the topic. Before getting started on the tips it’s important to know how to check the number of links Google recognizes. Most populate know about the cerebrate:www. YourDomainName com command that you can type into Google. This answer however ordain only return a sample be of links to your site and does not show the complete picture. To find out how many links Google actually sees you need to create an account at. It’s free to sign up and the information you will receive is of vital importance if you are trying to improve your Google rankings. If you already undergo an account simply go to the Dashboard click on your domain name click on Links on the left side bar and then select the pages with external links option to see how many websites are really linking to you. about the importance of having quality content if you want to rest out as a successful blogger. Quite simply if you aren’t writing material that is new different and offers an interesting perspective you won’t get readers or links to your blog. Just as important. I believe when you’re getting started is to pick a niche and dominate it. If you’re not making money online yet don’t write a blog about how to make money online! There is too much competition and you don’t have valuable content to add. Find a topic that you are passionate about and that isn’t too competitive yet. As an example. I chose famous entrepreneur stories. I now have the largest collection of stories of famous entrepreneurs anywhere online and get linked to as a resource. I’ve since been able to grow beyond the famous entrepreneur stories but it’s important to first start with a niche and get known as an expert in your field. Once you have picked your niche get involved in the community surrounding it. No matter what topic you pick there are blogs and forums already discussing it. connect the conversation! When I first started my site I listed the top 10 blogs and forums where entrepreneurs hung out. I commented on the blogs helped populate in the forums and answered questions as they came up. The bloggers appreciated my valuable insights and the forum members loved the help I gave them. I always included my website in my signature and pretty soon I was generating traffic and links from the community sites. Because I was getting known as an expert I also had people link to me from their sites without me having to affix a mention or forum entry on theirs! People link to Darren because he’s the beat in the world at helping bloggers turn their blogs into businesses. What are you going to be the beat at? Another strategy I used to create awareness and build links was to get media attention. I put keywords relating to my niche into a (a remove tool that lets you know when a new story comes out around a particular keyword) found news stories that dealt with the entrepreneurs I was profiling and contacted the reporters to congratulate them on a great article. I also offered them my insights and added them to a media list that I created in Excel. From then on I would displace them a press release every two weeks that dealt with a new famous entrepreneur story on my website. I also submitted the stories to free online PR directories and did some research as to how to write an effective press release and experimented with different headlines. This led to articles being written about my website in the New York Times. Globe and Mail (Canada’s most respected daily newspaper) the Dallas Morning News and countless other publications. It also led to television and radio appearances. Each time I gave them great stories as well as promoted my website. Always remember to ask for a link back from the media outlet. They are usually very highly ranked and the link can back up drive your search engine rankings. Social networking is all the rage now but it’s more than just hype. An effective social networking campaign can help drive tremendous amounts of traffic as well as build links to your site. I haven’t personally gotten much from sites like Facebook and MySpace but the news and bookmarking sites like StumbleUpon. Digg and del icio us have been fantastic traffic and link generators for my website. The key I’ve open is to start off with quality circumscribe and then get the community to back up you promote it. For example at the end of last year I compiled a list of the Top 50 SEO Posts of 2007 (Darren’s made the list). It was a list that brought genuine value to people and saved readers a lot of time. Instead of having to dig into each blog themselves we did the work for them to find the best posts on SEO of the year. Once we finished the top 50 we let everyone on the enumerate experience about it. Many of them blogged about it and linked approve to us others submitted it to StumbleUpon and other social networking sites. In the first week of the enumerate being out StumbleUpon alone sent me over 5,000 visitors to that one summon! When I first started the site I submitted it to all the relevant directories that I could find. In all honesty I didn’t get many hits from them except from but I viewed it as a link building apply that would eventually pay off. If you run any kind of events you need to also put them on Craigslist. We run a number of offline events for entrepreneurs and Craigslist helped send us a decent amount of merchandise. Their pages also rank well and you can include a link back to your site from the postings you create. Wikipedia is another excellent source worth checking out. Like every other webmaster before Wikipedia put nofollows on their links I was trying to get all my pages listed as external links on the famous entrepreneur related pages. The result? The editors quickly removed my links and wrote an telecommunicate to me warning me to stop. I did stop posting but was surprised to find out that I kept getting merchandise from Wikipedia. It turns out that a number of my readers had used my articles as references for different famous entrepreneurs. As a result they included a cerebrate and it was driving traffic! It again all comes down to being the best at something and dominating your niche. If I didn’t undergo good content then I would not undergo received the links from Wikipedia. As wonderful as it is to get bloggers and other website owners to link to you on the merit of your content alone sometimes they need a displace and an incentive to do so. As a result of building a popular website I began recruiting other experts to write for my site. Once you build up credibility in your niche you will have populate who want to be associated with you. As an example. I wonder how many populate are trying to guest blog for Darren while he’s gone? For my own place if the articles my guest authors submitted were relevant and valuable. I put them up. I then wrote to my authors and told them that if they linked back to my site from theirs I would furnish them even more exposure on my site and list them as Premium Partners. The incentive worked for many of them and I quickly built even more backlinks to my site from reputable experts. It sometimes takes thinking outside the box but if you can find a way to back up another webmaster in return for them linking to you the extra incentive can alter the difference between getting and not getting that all important link. Get as high a Page be link as you can from the websites who profile you. A link on a Page Rank 1 internal page versus a Page Rank 5 homepage will make a big difference to your site. Just because two pages are on the same domain label it doesn’t mean that they carry the same link value. When getting a link don’t tell people what anchor text to use (the blue text that is underlined). If all your links have the same anchor text you can get banned from Google for that keyword. I always ask my link partners to use fasten text that they conclude best describes what my website is all about. Evan this is a great post. It’s amazing that regardless how many days and years you read and learn about SEO you end up finding out that there is somebody out there that you can hit the books from. I won’t inform out what I learned from this affix but my point is that we all need to keep learning and reading and improving. Thanks for the great bring home the bacon. Regarding the comment about submitting your site to Google and submitting the sites that link to you. I seem to find that explore does find me very quick. Usually by the next day so I don’t unusually focus my efforts here. Something has to go because there is only so much time in the day! Thanks for such a quality post - this article falls in line with one of Leo’s tips at ZenHabits which is to alter your posts _insanely_ useful. Its probably my number one goal right now and this entry is a really good example. And thanks for the reminder on 1 hour a day for 24 hours rather than burning out. Its good to hear that - I tend to lean toward the back up option and it doesn’t work. Thanks Evan for the great tips! My new blog is just starting out and while I’m still working on creating that quality content and refining my style and come to new posts. I am also building links here and there. I’m certainly no ProBlogger but in two months I have generated about $5 from ads ($70 more and hosting is covered!!!) and that trend is optimistically upwards. :) I too have open MySpace to be pretty dead for returns on my time there while StumbleUpon simply rocks! So that is where my focus is alter now understanding StumbleUpon and the dynamics of that system. My current links to my site are < 500 so what would you say about that for a site that started measure December 2007? Is that good so far? About how many new links per month do you suspect is average for a ‘ProBlogger’? Is there a way to compare my stats with others (without some sneaky time-consuming methods). I read your comments about Wikipedia with a rueful express joy as the exact same thing happened to me. I’d interview people and write articles about subjects who had entries on Wikipedia so I’d place links there - only to undergo them removed by Wikipedia. Very annoying. Thanks also for the info on signing up to explore’s Webmaster tools. I had tried the link thing and wasn’t happy about what it showed… I’ll try it the other way and see what it tells me. Wayne - 500 links is a good go away - keep up the work! Try to cerebrate in on quality sites now that you undergo your base established. I just spent 6 months lining up a single link from a very respected website. After you get your locate going focus on the quality over the quantity. Every blogger starts somewhere so don’t get discouraged about the $5 - remember that the content will continue to bring home the bacon for you years down the road so you’re building a valuable asset!! I have to accept that building these links are a slow affect! I’ve only just started out blogging and movement has been decrease but I do experience I’ve just gotta fasten with it. And this affix has been particularly encouraging. Thanks. Evan! It doesnt take long to build links if you do it right i undergo grown to 9,000 links in just under a few weeks. Its possible if you know how look up link building on google has lots of stuff. summon Rank is important because not all links are created equal. For example a cerebrate from ProBlogger’s home summon is worth a lot more than a link from the inside page on a brand new blog with no summon Rank. Page Rank can also tell you if a blog has been banned by Google if it has been (see JohnChow com) then a link from that site won’t help you and can actually undergo a negative effect on your own site. Hi Barbara Peterson - the trick with Wikipedia is that the link has to be of genuine value. If it’s obviously just a related link then you’ll get removed. If it’s adding serious value to the affix then it’s more likely to stay on - but even then you can have an overbearing administrator who removes you. I’ve also found more luck with less popular pages than the ones that are constantly being update. Chances are you can add more value to a page that hasn’t had as much work and the link will stay. Google Says:“Please note: Only the top-level summon from a host is necessary; you do not need to submit each individual page. Our crawler. Googlebot will be able to find the be. Google updates its list on a regular basis so updated or outdated link submissions are not necessary. Dead links ordain ‘fade out’ of our list on our next crawl when we update our entire index.” You should of course submit your homepage. Sometimes however if your linking structure isn’t well done then Google can’t reach down into your lower pages. Google also sometimes misses pages you undergo on your site. My webpage for example has over 46,000 pages of content so it’s understandable that Google might miss a few of them. Google also encourages you to let them know about what’s on your site through their sitemap tool - you can learn more about it at Thanks for response Evan. My only anticipate is maybe I have too high KW density on my home page for my main KW I evaluate around 13%. Example each nav-button features KW… maybe I should mouth this down… I do have close to 500 incoming links. My categories for link exchange are well defined and closely related to my niche site and I react quite a few unrelated requests. However I suspect I may be linking through to some poor quality sites? Or even a linkfarm or two? not sure unless I review all of my link exchanges - is this advisable? If so. Ugh… I’ve heard that it’s best not to link to low PR sites - but how are they ever going to move up the ranks without a little boost from higher ranking sites? Thanks for the update.. I am a web-developer and I know how to optimize each page for explore. Maybe for layman this option is alter but I do declare If anyone owns a website he/she has to work a lot on sitemaps meta-tags and SEO this way no page will be left alone.. I undergo been so busy with my office and freelance work and I finally uploaded my website on Jan 2008 and I have each summon listed on Google and sometimes it takes only 1-2 hours for google to index my page. I undergo personally observed that. Hi Russell - It’s good to have a mix of links out to pages with high Page Rank as well as low. I would worry if all the links are going to low summon Rank sites. I would mind even more if you are linking out to a link farm or page that has been banned by Google. If you had thousands of links then I wouldn’t worry about it too much but if it’s still a relatively small amount then you don’t be to risk a penalization by Google. For the keyword density. 13% sounds very high to me. What I usually do is use my keywords once every paragraph or two paragraphs of text and make sure to use them in the title tags url and H1 tag. Hi Missy - No this is not change by reversal. If you undergo lost Page Rank you can comfort submit a sitemap to Google. My own Page be has fluctuated in the past and when I had a drop I could still refer my sitemaps. If you have been banned however a sitemap won’t do you any good because you’re not in explore’s index. The best solution here is to fix the spammy elements of your site and submit a re-inclusion request in Google’s webmaster tools to get yourself listed again. PageRank has absolutely NOTHING to do with your SERP rankings. Or anything for that matter. They are two completely displace algos. It doesn’t matter if you get links from PR1 or PR5 sites. What google cares about is relevancy and PR has nothing at all to do with relevance. Most of the time a site with a high PR is more trusted than a site with low PR which COULD mean that the cerebrate has a higher value. But it’s not thanks to the PR. Stop caring about it. The only good thing about getting a high PR is so you could sell the site to people who think it actually mean something. Google’s entire system is based on links. If you don’t have links to your place then you won’t rank for any keywords unless they are extremely uncompetitive. With all the cerebrate farms that were soon created after Google became the #1 examine engine it makes sense that the quantity of links is not a good measure on its own to help rank a site. You could have 1,000,000 links to your site but if they are all low quality it won’t do you much good. One link from a come up respected page does a lot more than thousands of poor quality links. A great example was Wikipedia. Before they turned their links to “nofollow” I had a number of my pages linked from them. All of those pages quickly ranked to the first page of search results in Google. Google likes high authority websites and if you get linked from them your chances of ranking higher also goes up. PageRank is the measurement of how much authority Google thinks a website has. There is a reason why ProBlogger has a Page Rank of 6 while new blogs start out with 0. Of cover you still need the quality and related content. Just because you have a high Page Rank it doesn’t convey you’ll rank for a keyword outside of your area of interest. The two work hand in transfer. Darren is not going to rank for a keyword desire “healthy foods” because his content doesn’t speak to that topic. However if you type in “alter money blogging”. Darren is #1. If two pages have similar content and are targeted the same keywords the page with the higher Page Rank ordain come out on top in the explore index. Evan what value is the Wikipedia? I heard they are no go links and same for Craigs list. What value does Google furnish to no follow links? Also one of my blogs went from PR 5 to the gray bar. Any chance to resurrect that? In the last update in January 2008 one of my internal pages went from PR 4 to the gray bar and this week’s February update it went approve to normal. Have you heard about this problem concerning blogs getting the gray bar on the home page? The Wikipedia strategy is more for merchandise than building summon be. After search engines and social networks wikipedia is my #1 referring place. There are some who accept that a cerebrate from Wikipedia does still back up your SERPs even though it’s no follow because Google loves Wikipedia so much. A number of the pages that I am linked from in Wikipedia have risen in explore’s SERPs but I don’t undergo any comprehensive data to say that it helps. If you dropped from a 5 then you likely have been hit with a Google penalty. Have you done anything that you would get penalized? The best thing to do is fix the problems and then submit a re-inclusion request through your Google webmasters be.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.problogger.net/archives/2008/02/28/how-to-build-22938-links-to-your-blog/

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam


"How To Build 22938 Links To Your Blog" posted by ~Ray
Posted on 2008-09-15 21:11:40

It’s no secret that building links to your website ordain help control more referral traffic as well as increase your rankings in Google and the other study search engines. In previous ProBlogger posts and undergo talked about it. Darren has also been known to create a post on the topic. Before getting started on the tips it’s important to experience how to analyse the number of links Google recognizes. Most people know about the link:www. YourDomainName com command that you can type into Google. This function however ordain only return a sample number of links to your site and does not show the end picture. To find out how many links Google actually sees you need to create an be at. It’s free to sign up and the information you ordain receive is of vital importance if you are trying to improve your Google rankings. If you already undergo an be simply go to the Dashboard click on your domain name move on Links on the left side bar and then select the pages with external links option to see how many websites are really linking to you. about the importance of having quality circumscribe if you be to stand out as a successful blogger. Quite simply if you aren’t writing material that is new different and offers an interesting perspective you won’t get readers or links to your blog. Just as important. I believe when you’re getting started is to pick a niche and dominate it. If you’re not making money online yet don’t write a blog about how to make money online! There is too much competition and you don’t have valuable content to add. Find a topic that you are passionate about and that isn’t too competitive yet. As an example. I chose famous entrepreneur stories. I now have the largest collection of stories of famous entrepreneurs anywhere online and get linked to as a resource. I’ve since been able to expand beyond the famous entrepreneur stories but it’s important to first start with a niche and get known as an expert in your field. Once you have picked your niche get involved in the community surrounding it. No matter what topic you pick there are blogs and forums already discussing it. Join the conversation! When I first started my place I listed the top 10 blogs and forums where entrepreneurs hung out. I commented on the blogs helped people in the forums and answered questions as they came up. The bloggers appreciated my valuable insights and the forum members loved the back up I gave them. I always included my website in my signature and pretty soon I was generating merchandise and links from the community sites. Because I was getting known as an expert I also had people link to me from their sites without me having to affix a comment or forum entry on theirs! People link to Darren because he’s the best in the world at helping bloggers turn their blogs into businesses. What are you going to be the best at? Another strategy I used to create awareness and create links was to get media attention. I put keywords relating to my niche into a (a free tool that lets you experience when a new story comes out around a particular keyword) found news stories that dealt with the entrepreneurs I was profiling and contacted the reporters to congratulate them on a great bind. I also offered them my insights and added them to a media enumerate that I created in Excel. From then on I would send them a press release every two weeks that dealt with a new famous entrepreneur story on my website. I also submitted the stories to remove online PR directories and did some research as to how to write an effective touch channel and experimented with different headlines. This led to articles being written about my website in the New York Times. Globe and Mail (Canada’s most respected daily newspaper) the Dallas Morning News and countless other publications. It also led to television and radio appearances. Each time I gave them great stories as well as promoted my website. Always bequeath to ask for a link back from the media outlet. They are usually very highly ranked and the cerebrate can back up control your search engine rankings. Social networking is all the rage now but it’s more than just hype. An effective social networking campaign can help drive tremendous amounts of traffic as well as create links to your site. I haven’t personally gotten much from sites desire Facebook and MySpace but the news and bookmarking sites like StumbleUpon. Digg and del icio us have been fantastic merchandise and link generators for my website. The key I’ve found is to start off with quality content and then get the community to back up you promote it. For example at the end of last year I compiled a list of the Top 50 SEO Posts of 2007 (Darren’s made the enumerate). It was a list that brought genuine value to populate and saved readers a lot of time. Instead of having to dig into each blog themselves we did the work for them to sight the best posts on SEO of the year. Once we finished the top 50 we let everyone on the list know about it. Many of them blogged about it and linked back to us others submitted it to StumbleUpon and other social networking sites. In the first week of the list being out StumbleUpon alone sent me over 5,000 visitors to that one summon! When I first started the site I submitted it to all the relevant directories that I could find. In all honesty I didn’t get many hits from them except from but I viewed it as a link building exercise that would eventually pay off. If you run any kind of events you need to also put them on Craigslist. We run a number of offline events for entrepreneurs and Craigslist helped displace us a decent be of traffic. Their pages also rank well and you can include a link back to your site from the postings you create. Wikipedia is another excellent source worth checking out. Like every other webmaster before Wikipedia put nofollows on their links I was trying to get all my pages listed as external links on the famous entrepreneur related pages. The result? The editors quickly removed my links and wrote an email to me warning me to stop. I did forbid posting but was surprised to find out that I kept getting traffic from Wikipedia. It turns out that a number of my readers had used my articles as references for different famous entrepreneurs. As a result they included a link and it was driving merchandise! It again all comes down to being the best at something and dominating your niche. If I didn’t have good content then I would not undergo received the links from Wikipedia. As wonderful as it is to get bloggers and other website owners to link to you on the be of your circumscribe alone sometimes they need a push and an incentive to do so. As a result of building a popular website I began recruiting other experts to write for my site. Once you create up credibility in your niche you will undergo people who want to be associated with you. As an example. I wonder how many people are trying to guest communicate for Darren while he’s gone? For my own site if the articles my guest authors submitted were relevant and valuable. I put them up. I then wrote to my authors and told them that if they linked approve to my place from theirs I would furnish them change surface more exposure on my site and list them as Premium Partners. The incentive worked for many of them and I quickly built even more backlinks to my site from reputable experts. It sometimes takes thinking outside the box but if you can find a way to help another webmaster in return for them linking to you the extra incentive can make the difference between getting and not getting that all important link. Get as high a Page Rank link as you can from the websites who compose you. A link on a Page Rank 1 internal summon versus a Page be 5 homepage ordain make a big difference to your site. Just because two pages are on the same domain name it doesn’t mean that they carry the same cerebrate value. When getting a link don’t tell populate what fasten text to use (the blue text that is underlined). If all your links have the same fasten text you can get banned from Google for that keyword. I always ask my link partners to use anchor text that they feel best describes what my website is all about. Evan this is a great post. It’s amazing that regardless how many days and years you construe and learn about SEO you end up finding out that there is somebody out there that you can learn from. I won’t point out what I learned from this affix but my inform is that we all need to keep learning and reading and improving. Thanks for the great work. Regarding the comment about submitting your place to Google and submitting the sites that link to you. I seem to find that Google does sight me very quick. Usually by the next day so I don’t unusually focus my efforts here. Something has to go because there is only so much time in the day! Thanks for such a quality affix - this article falls in line with one of Leo’s tips at ZenHabits which is to alter your posts _insanely_ useful. Its probably my number one goal alter now and this entry is a really good example. And thanks for the reminder on 1 hour a day for 24 hours rather than burning out. Its good to hear that - I be to lean toward the second option and it doesn’t work. Thanks Evan for the great tips! My new communicate is just starting out and while I’m still working on creating that quality content and refining my style and come to new posts. I am also building links here and there. I’m certainly no ProBlogger but in two months I undergo generated about $5 from ads ($70 more and hosting is covered!!!) and that trend is optimistically upwards. :) I too undergo open MySpace to be pretty dead for returns on my time there while StumbleUpon simply rocks! So that is where my focus is alter now understanding StumbleUpon and the dynamics of that system. My current links to my site are < 500 so what would you say about that for a place that started last December 2007? Is that good so far? About how many new links per month do you suspect is average for a ‘ProBlogger’? Is there a way to compare my stats with others (without some sneaky time-consuming methods). I read your comments about Wikipedia with a rueful express joy as the exact same thing happened to me. I’d interview people and write articles about subjects who had entries on Wikipedia so I’d displace links there - only to have them removed by Wikipedia. Very annoying. Thanks also for the info on signing up to explore’s Webmaster tools. I had tried the link thing and wasn’t happy about what it showed… I’ll try it the other way and see what it tells me. Wayne - 500 links is a good start - keep up the work! Try to focus in on quality sites now that you have your locate established. I just spent 6 months lining up a single link from a very respected website. After you get your base going cerebrate on the quality over the quantity. Every blogger starts somewhere so don’t get discouraged about the $5 - bequeath that the content will continue to work for you years drink the road so you’re building a valuable asset!! I have to agree that building these links are a decrease process! I’ve only just started out blogging and movement has been slow but I do experience I’ve just gotta fasten with it. And this post has been particularly encouraging. Thanks. Evan! It doesnt take long to build links if you do it right i have grown to 9,000 links in just under a few weeks. Its possible if you know how be up link building on explore has lots of stuff. Page Rank is important because not all links are created compete. For example a link from ProBlogger’s home page is worth a lot more than a link from the inside page on a brand new blog with no Page Rank. Page Rank can also tell you if a blog has been banned by Google if it has been (see JohnChow com) then a link from that place won’t back up you and can actually undergo a negative effect on your own site. Hi Barbara Peterson - the trick with Wikipedia is that the link has to be of genuine value. If it’s obviously just a related link then you’ll get removed. If it’s adding serious value to the post then it’s more likely to stay on - but even then you can have an overbearing administrator who removes you. I’ve also open more luck with less popular pages than the ones that are constantly being update. Chances are you can add more value to a page that hasn’t had as much work and the link will stay. explore Says:“Please note: Only the top-level page from a host is necessary; you do not need to submit each individual page. Our crawler. Googlebot will be able to find the be. Google updates its index on a regular basis so updated or outdated link submissions are not necessary. Dead links will ‘weaken out’ of our index on our next crawl when we update our entire index.” You should of course submit your homepage. Sometimes however if your linking structure isn’t come up done then Google can’t reach drink into your lower pages. Google also sometimes misses pages you have on your site. My webpage for example has over 46,000 pages of circumscribe so it’s understandable that Google might desire a few of them. Google also encourages you to let them experience about what’s on your site through their sitemap tool - you can learn more about it at Thanks for response Evan. My only guess is maybe I have too high KW density on my home page for my main KW I evaluate around 13%. Example each nav-button features KW… maybe I should tone this down… I do have close to 500 incoming links. My categories for cerebrate exchange are come up defined and closely related to my niche site and I react quite a few unrelated requests. However I guess I may be linking through to some poor quality sites? Or even a linkfarm or two? not sure unless I review all of my link exchanges - is this advisable? If so. Ugh… I’ve heard that it’s beat not to link to low PR sites - but how are they ever going to act up the ranks without a little boost from higher ranking sites? Thanks for the update.. I am a web-developer and I experience how to optimize each page for google. Maybe for layman this option is right but I do suggest If anyone owns a website he/she has to bring home the bacon a lot on sitemaps meta-tags and SEO this way no page will be left alone.. I have been so busy with my office and do work work and I finally uploaded my website on Jan 2008 and I have each page listed on Google and sometimes it takes only 1-2 hours for google to index my summon. I have personally observed that. Hi Russell - It’s good to have a mix of links out to pages with high Page Rank as well as low. I would worry if all the links are going to low Page be sites. I would worry even more if you are linking out to a link farm or summon that has been banned by Google. If you had thousands of links then I wouldn’t mind about it too much but if it’s still a relatively small be then you don’t want to risk a penalization by Google. For the keyword density. 13% sounds very high to me. What I usually do is use my keywords once every paragraph or two paragraphs of text and alter sure to use them in the title tags url and H1 tag. Hi Missy - No this is not correct. If you have lost Page Rank you can comfort submit a sitemap to Google. My own summon Rank has fluctuated in the past and when I had a drop I could still submit my sitemaps. If you have been banned however a sitemap won’t do you any good because you’re not in Google’s index. The best solution here is to fix the spammy elements of your place and submit a re-inclusion request in Google’s webmaster tools to get yourself listed again. PageRank has absolutely NOTHING to do with your SERP rankings. Or anything for that matter. They are two completely separate algos. It doesn’t matter if you get links from PR1 or PR5 sites. What google cares about is relevancy and PR has nothing at all to do with relevance. Most of the time a site with a high PR is more trusted than a place with low PR which COULD mean that the link has a higher determine. But it’s not thanks to the PR. Stop caring about it. The only good thing about getting a high PR is so you could sell the place to people who evaluate it actually convey something. Google’s entire system is based on links. If you don’t have links to your site then you won’t rank for any keywords unless they are extremely uncompetitive. With all the link farms that were soon created after Google became the #1 search engine it makes sense that the quantity of links is not a good decide on its own to help rank a site. You could have 1,000,000 links to your site but if they are all low quality it won’t do you much good. One cerebrate from a well respected page does a lot more than thousands of poor quality links. A great example was Wikipedia. Before they turned their links to “nofollow” I had a number of my pages linked from them. All of those pages quickly ranked to the first page of search results in Google. Google likes high authority websites and if you get linked from them your chances of ranking higher also goes up. PageRank is the measurement of how much authority Google thinks a website has. There is a reason why ProBlogger has a Page Rank of 6 while new blogs start out with 0. Of course you still need the quality and related circumscribe. Just because you undergo a high Page be it doesn’t convey you’ll rank for a keyword outside of your area of interest. The two work hand in hand. Darren is not going to be for a keyword like “healthy foods” because his content doesn’t speak to that topic. However if you type in “make money blogging”. Darren is #1. If two pages have similar circumscribe and are targeted the same keywords the page with the higher Page be will go out on top in the Google index. Evan what value is the Wikipedia? I heard they are no follow links and same for Craigs list. What value does Google furnish to no follow links? Also one of my blogs went from PR 5 to the gray bar. Any chance to resuscitate that? In the last update in January 2008 one of my internal pages went from PR 4 to the gray bar and this week’s February update it went back to normal. Have you heard about this problem concerning blogs getting the gray bar on the home page? The Wikipedia strategy is more for traffic than building Page Rank. After examine engines and social networks wikipedia is my #1 referring site. There are some who accept that a link from Wikipedia does still help your SERPs even though it’s no follow because explore loves Wikipedia so much. A be of the pages that I am linked from in Wikipedia have risen in Google’s SERPs but I don’t have any comprehensive data to say that it helps. If you dropped from a 5 then you likely have been hit with a Google penalty. Have you done anything that you would get penalized? The best thing to do is fix the problems and then submit a re-inclusion request through your Google webmasters account.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.problogger.net/archives/2008/02/28/how-to-build-22938-links-to-your-blog/

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam


"Investor Political Priorities - A Survey by Steve Selengut" posted by ~Ray
Posted on 2008-02-29 20:08:52

by Steve SelengutHere we are in the midst of a presidential campaign trying to select a new leader for what is still the most economically powerful nation on Earth. The candidates are kissing all the babies they can get their palms on and smiling until their cheek muscles ache; but ordain they be able to produce any of the changes they talk about? Do we really want them to? 90% of all Americans are investors and as such there are issues that we be to hear about from the man who would be king. None of our could-be leaders are addressing the issues that would allow us to bring home the bacon our financial goals. What we all want is to keep more of what we make and then to spend it as we see fit. It's not alter how the candidates intend to help us. Is investor enemy number one a tax a budding foreign economy a scarce commodity the powerful institutions lobbyists list funds or the politicians themselves? While the campaigns cerebrate on social issues they purposely ignore the economic realities of their proposals. Politics and Economics are like oil and water; they don't mix well but both are necessities. The very rich and the corporations that spawn them are the biggest contributors to the foundations that finance social change. Increasing their costs and raising their tax liabilities is not going to increase the numbers of jobs they provide or the number of dollars they alter. Investor enemy be one is an ideology a categorise distinction between the super-rich and the not-so-comfortable-yet. You don't help the middle class by stealing from the creative and successful. You do so by increasing their "keep". Here's a list of candidates for the investor priority number one title. What do you think and/or what would you add? Please back up me prepare a ranking that I can publish before the November elections.(1) Social Security Reform. If I were to place $2,000 per year in an investment vehicle with a guaranteed interest rate of just 3% per year. I would: hive away enough money to generate significantly more monthly income than that provided by Social Security create significant cash values for my heirs and have more spending money to pump up the economy. Nothing be be risked in the have market. My boss would be able to hire additional workers reduce prices and change magnitude dividends to shareholders (you). We can act him from buying a yacht. Thousands of new jobs would be created in an old industry and in supporting areas. (2) Corporate Income Tax Reform. Eliminating the Corporate Income Tax without enriching obscenely compensated executives could redistribute enormous amounts of spendable income to all employees increase the likelihood of job growth in all businesses reduce the costs of goods and services and possibly their prices and improve payouts to shareholders. It would also reduce the amount of money spent frivolously for tax reasons alone. We can regulate the transition to make it create these changes and possibly to reduce the need for offshore outsourcing.(3) Control Obscene Executive Compensation. This is nothing bunco of grand theft shareholder and a basic source of the relate so richly deserved by many of today's corporations. Here's a great opportunity for jobs in a new regulatory agency and for public relations consultants. Arbitrary compensation limits would be set for all public companies and cash only compensation would be allowed.. no stock options unqualified pension benefits deferred compensation vacation homes golden parachutes etc. Above a certain level. 75% of the excess compensation in any form would be donated in cash to the executives' favorite charities (directly from his or her paycheck) but the donation would not be deductible from any other taxes.(4) Health Care Reform. Corporations give health care benefits because it helps them attract and retain employees. The same is true of the 401(k) savings plans and other self-directed gambling devices that have taken the place of defined benefit pension plans. These benefits cut into change salaries profits dividends and jobs provided but are thought to be worth the costs in improved morale and retention. Mandating additional or involuntary benefits for employees will either cut something or raise prices. Related issues that must be addressed if health care and/or insurance costs are ever to be brought under hold back: insurance fraud and tort reform. Known pre-existing conditions are not insurable risks that all insureds should pay for; they are a social welfare concern that must be dealt with by government agencies. (5) Your Pet Issue: (6) Tort Reform. Lawsuit awards in all areas must be limited to amounts that are reasonable and people must be held accountable for their own stupidity irresponsibility and clumsiness. Potential suits should be reviewed and possibly arbitrated by non-lawyers before going send. If you spill hot coffee on your lap be more careful next time. All costs whether they are insurance settlements or legal fees find their way into the prices we pay. It's just this simple the deep pockets are always our own.(7) Personal Income Tax Reform. Is it enough to say that we tax award and other retirement income including the sacred pittance from Social Security. The income tax needs to be revised reformed or replaced by something. Eliminating the tax on all forms of retirement and investment income including capital gains rents royalties etc would have incredible positive effects (and would guarantee a Pennsylvania Avenue address for eight years). The next administration could earn another eight years by combining the various Flat and Fair Tax proposals. That could manifold total tax revenues reduce price levels create/save thousands of jobs and expand the economy.(8 ) adjust The Regulators. Every scandal produces new levels of regulations and additional cadres of secret guard who raise business costs in the name of compliance with da law. Countless hours of non-productive measure are mandated by broad-brush policies and procedural requirements that do little to protect the consumer--- in many cases they simply displease the people they are supposed to back up. Financial services firms for example employ thousands of people to protect the firm from the examiners not to protect the client from unscrupulous employees. I've heard similar stories of the abuse of power that seems to be SOP in most regulatory agencies.(9) dress Exchange Traded Index Funds. Index ETFs have replaced plain vanilla mutual funds as the most popular form of speculation in the financial world today--- even more popular than sub-prime mortgage paper was just a few months ago and with the same risks. These are glorified gambling mechanisms whose price movements undergo little to do with the economics (or economies) of the companies inside. Stock prices are pushed up (or down) by demand for the indices not by their fundamentals.(10) regenerate the Up-Tick Rule. The up-tick command that applied to short selling since 1929 was eliminated in July of 2007; the markets have been feeling the impact ever since. Theoretically if not actually unscrupulous persons could bring aim companies to their financial knees for their own purposes. In the change state of the sub-prime mess for example it became difficult for some companies involved to raise capital efficiently because of shorting tactics employed by hedge fund operators. This is my short list for the presidential candidates. Where they rest on these issues will certainly influence our economic future. Which of these is most important? I think that either Social Security Reform or the elimination of all taxes on retirement and investment income would undergo the biggest and most lasting impact. What do you evaluate? Really let me know what you think. Steve SelengutProfessional Portfolio Management since 1979Author of: "The Brainwashing of the American Investor: The schedule that Wall Street Does Not Want YOU to Read" and "A Millionaire's Secret Investment Strategy"

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.onlinetradersforum.com/showthread.php?t=18678

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam


"JFK & Federal Reserve" posted by ~Ray
Posted on 2008-02-29 20:08:50

On June 4. 1963 a virtually unknown Presidential decree. Executive request 11110 was signed with the authority to basically strip the Federal Reserve tip of its power to give money to the United States Federal Government at interest. With the stroke of a pen. President Kennedy declared that the privately owned Federal keep back Bank would soon be out of business. The Christian Law Fellowship has exhaustively researched this matter through the Federal Register and Library of Congress. We can now safely conclude that this Executive Order has never been repealed amended or superceded by any subsequent Executive Order. In simple terms it is still valid. When President John Fitzgerald Kennedy - the author of Profiles in Courage -signed this Order it returned to the federal government specifically the Treasury Department the Constitutional cater to create and issue currency -money - without going through the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank. President Kennedy's Executive request 11110 [the full text is displayed further below] gave the Treasury Department the explicit authority: "to air silver certificates against any silver bullion silver or standard silver dollars in the Treasury." This means that for every ounce of silver in the U. S. Treasury's vault the government could introduce new money into circulation based on the silver bullion physically held there. As a result more than $4 billion in United States Notes were brought into circulation in $2 and $5 denominations. $10 and $20 United States Notes were never circulated but were being printed by the Treasury Department when Kennedy was assassinated. It appears obvious that President Kennedy knew the Federal Reserve Notes being used as the purported legal currency were contrary to the Constitution of the United States of America. "United States Notes" were issued as an interest-free and debt-free currency backed by plate reserves in the U. S. Treasury. We compared a "Federal keep back Note" issued from the private central bank of the United States (the Federal Reserve tip a/k/a Federal Reserve System) with a "United States say" from the U. S. Treasury issued by President Kennedy's Executive request. They almost look alike except one says "Federal Reserve say" on the top while the other says "United States Note". Also the Federal Reserve Note has a green seal and serial number while the United States Note has a red close and serial number. President Kennedy was assassinated on November 22. 1963 and the United States Notes he had issued were immediately taken out of circulation. Federal Reserve Notes continued to answer as the legal currency of the nation. According to the United States Secret function. 99% of all U. S paper "currency" circulating in 1999 are Federal Reserve Notes. Kennedy knew that if the silver-backed United States Notes were widely circulated they would have eliminated the demand for Federal keep back Notes. This is a very simple matter of economics. The USN was backed by silver and the FRN was not backed by anything of intrinsic value. Executive Order 11110 should have prevented the national debt from reaching its current level (virtually all of the nearly $9 trillion in federal debt has been created since 1963) if LBJ or any subsequent President were to enforce it. It would undergo almost immediately given the U. S. Government the ability to pay its debt without going to the private Federal keep back Banks and being charged interest to create new "money". Executive request 11110 gave the U. S. A the ability to once again create its own money backed by plate and realm determine worth something. Again according to our own investigate just five months after Kennedy was assassinated no more of the Series 1958 "plate Certificates" were issued either and they were subsequently removed from circulation. Perhaps the assassination of JFK was a warning to all future presidents not to hinder with the private Federal Reserve's hold back over the creation of money. It seems very apparent that President Kennedy challenged the "powers that exist behind U. S and world finance". With true patriotic courage. JFK boldly faced the two most successful vehicles that have ever been used to drive up debt: 1) war (Viet Nam); and. 2) the creation of money by a privately owned central bank. His efforts to have all U. S troops out of Vietnam by 1965 combined with Executive request 11110 would undergo destroyed the profits and hold back of the private Federal Reserve tip. AMENDMENT OF EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 10289 AS AMENDED. RELATING TO THE PERFORMANCE OF CERTAIN FUNCTIONS AFFECTING THE DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY. By virtue of the authority vested in me by divide 301 of title 3 of the United States Code it is ordered as follows: divide 1. Executive request No. 10289 of September 19. 1951 as amended is hereby advance amended - (a) By adding at the end of paragraph 1 thereof the following subparagraph (j): "(j) The authority vested in the President by paragraph (b) of divide 43 of the Act of May 12. 1933 as amended (31 U. S. C. 821 (b)) to issue silver certificates against any silver bullion silver or standard plate dollars in the Treasury not then held for redemption of any outstanding plate certificates to prescribe the denominations of such plate certificates and to coin standard silver dollars and subsidiary plate currency for their redemption," and (b) By revoking subparagraphs (b) and (c) of carve up 2 thereof. SECTION 2. The amendment made by this Order shall not alter any act done or any right accruing or accrued or any suit or proceeding had or commenced in any civil or criminal cause prior to the date of this request but all such liabilities shall continue and may be enforced as if said amendments had not been made. xoxoxOnce again. Executive request 11110 is comfort valid. According to Title 3. United States Code. divide 301 dated January 26. 1998: Executive Order (EO) 10289 dated Sept. 17. 1951. 16 F. R. 9499 was as amended by: EO... 10583 dated December 18. 1954. 19 F. R. 8725; EO... 10882 dated July 18. 1960. 25 F. R. 6869; EO... 11110 dated June 4. 1963. 28 F. R. 5605; EO... 11825 dated December 31. 1974. 40 F. R. 1003; EO... 12608 dated September 9. 1987. 52 F. R. 34617 The 1974 and 1987 amendments added after Kennedy's 1963 amendment did not change or alter any part of Kennedy's EO 11110. A search of Clinton's 1998 and 1999 EO's and Presidential Directives has also shown no reference to any alterations suspensions or changes to EO 11110. The Federal Reserve Bank a k a Federal Reserve System is a Private Corporation. Black's Law Dictionary defines the "Federal Reserve System" as: "communicate of twelve central banks to which most national banks belong and to which express chartered banks may belong. Membership rules require investment of have and minimum reserves." Privately-owned banks own the stock of the FED. This was explained in more detail in the inspect of Lewis v. United States. Federal Reporter. 2nd Series. Vol. 680. Pages 1239. 1241 (1982) where the court said: "Each Federal Reserve Bank is a displace corporation owned by commercial banks in its region. The stock-holding commercial banks choose two thirds of each Bank's nine member come in of directors". The Federal Reserve Banks are locally controlled by their member banks. Once again according to Black's Law Dictionary we find that these privately owned banks actually air money: "Federal Reserve Act. Law which created Federal Reserve banks which act as agents in maintaining money reserves issuing money in the form of tip notes lending money to banks and supervising banks. Administered by Federal Reserve Board (q v.)". The privately owned Federal keep back (FED) banks actually issue (create) the "money" we use. In 1964 the House Committee on Banking and Currency. Subcommittee on Domestic pay at the back up session of the 88th Congress put out a study entitled Money Facts which contains a good description of what the FED is: "The