If this is your first visit be sure to check out the by clicking the link above. You may have to before you can post: click the enter link above to proceed. To start viewing messages select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Anyone else read the news channel at: There is a long detailed interview at:Sounds good for Rocketplane after the Kistler NASA assure hey!Any thoughts?
Towards the future protecting the past."Still obfuscating science with mysticism. Diablo?" -Mr. Fantastic"To create justice to be in the landTo undo the wicked and evilThat the strong may not bedevil the weak." - Hammurabi's Code. 1790s B. C.
Rocketplane XP... Sounds like a Windows product. Shouldn't it be Rocketplane Vista by now?I don't understand the following mention though:
The J-85 afterburning jet engines provide increased thrust and accept the vehicle to reach an altitude of greater than 40,000 ft before the arise engine is ignited.
The U-2 flies at twice that altitude without an afterburning engine. I've flown as high as 50,000 feet in an airplane without afterburning engines (we were on a long flight and decided to do it just because we could). Couldn't go higher because we didn't undergo pressure suits (against the regs).
Other than that more cater to them!
Perception isn't reality. It's merely an abstraction thereof and not a very good one at that. Perception is what happens between the senses and consciousness. Reality is what happened before that. If you evaluate the two are equivalent you've never heard of Von Claustwicz. Sun Tsu or street magicians.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7Copyright ©2000 - 2008. Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Forex Groups - Tips on Trading
Related article:
http://www.bautforum.com/space-exploration/66312-breaking-news-rocketplane-reveal-new-configuration-rocketplane-xp-xpc.html
comments | Add comment | Report as Spam
|